Editorial team. Dover Publications Science and Method, written in , has been appreciated by a wide audience of nonprofessionals and translated into many languages. It defines the basic methodology and psychology of scientific discovery, particularly in regard to mathematics and mathematical physics. Drawing on examples from many fields, it explains how scientists analyze and choose their working facts, and it explores the nature of experimentation, theory, and the mind.
Translated by Francis Maitland. Scientific Conventionalism in General Philosophy of Science. Edit this record.
Mark as duplicate. Find it on Scholar.
How the Scientific Method Works
Request removal from index. Revision history. Google Books no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Configure custom resolver. Surveying Philosophers About Philosophical Intuition.
Go from Quantum to Cosmic
Kuntz - - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 4 Bob Doyle - - William James Studies Mathematical Beauty, Understanding, and Discovery. Carlo Cellucci - - Foundations of Science 20 4 Philosophy of Mathematics: Making a Fresh Start.
Victor Rodych - - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 2 This is a pet peeve of mine. I feel as though I now have a better sense of some of the tensions between scientists and journalists. Science places much more of an emphasis on processes. Journalism places much more of an emphasis on outcomes.
To journalists, the process of scientific discovery is tortuously incremental. Journalists think in discrete stories.
Onto the next. In science, the continued journey toward greater knowledge is an unending quest. Scientists spend entire careers advancing the state of knowledge in their field, not whizzing from discovery to discovery, but gradually pursuing an ever-greater understanding. The ability to turn the process of reporting into a compelling, unending story of its own is becoming an increasingly vital journalistic skill. I encourage the journalists I work with to think in streams, not just discrete stories.
Your feed is more important than any single post, and a subscriber is more valuable than a visitor. If you can hook people into your ongoing quest for greater understanding of a beat or topic, you wield a much more powerful asset than the crowd of random people who happen to find one of your stories.
- How the Science Entertainment Television Show MythBusters Teaches the Scientific Method.
- Science and Method - Henri Poincaré - Google книги;
- The method of science.
- Consultative Hematology, An Issue of Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America - E-Book (The Clinics: Internal Medicine);
- Download options.
- The Alhambra Vol III.
Paul Ford recently wrote a beautiful, much-forwarded essay for New York Magazine about the rising importance of the stream. Social media has no understanding of anything aside from the connections between individuals and the ceaseless flow of time: No beginnings, and no endings. These disparate threads of human existence alternately fascinate and horrify that part of the media world that grew up on topic sentences and strong conclusions. This world of old media is like a giant steampunk machine that organizes time into stories.
I call it the Epiphanator, and it has always known the value of a meaningful conclusion. Once a day it makes a terrible grinding noise and spits out newspapers and TV shows.
Once a week it spits out weeklies and more TV shows. Once a month it produces glossy magazines. All too often it makes movies, and novels. The evening news segment concludes by showing the Secretary of State getting back onto her helicopter. The Epiphanator transmits them all.
It promises that things are orderly. It insists that life makes sense, that there is an underlying logic.
Atheism Is Inconsistent with the Scientific Method, Prizewinning Physicist Says
These two concepts — the Epiphanator and the stream — can and should live alongside each other. A fact that a reporter has taken great pains to prosecute and verify should hold more weight than a soundbite delivered with plenty of pizazz and zero evidence to support it. But to make that distinction, we need to present the process. And we need to make it as arresting as the outcome. To quote myself :. By putting all that in there, Fallows makes the story accessible, engaging, and deeply informative, not overly reflective or self-indulgent.
Science, metaphysics and method | SpringerLink
In fact, there are many ways that the field of science is falling behind journalism in adapting to changes in our society. And I invite you to share your thoughts with me in the comments section of this story. Home What journalists can learn from scientists and the scientific method.